Sarah Butler
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Big supermarket chains were yesterday given the opportunity to build out-of-town developments after the Government released proposals to relax planning laws.
There were immediate fears that corner shops and smaller stores would lose business or be forced to close as people opted to drive out of town.
The White Paper suggests ditching the current test, under which supermarket chains must prove that a new outlet is needed on the outskirts of towns before they can receive planning approval.
Under the latest proposals, the “needs” test will be merged with the current “impact” test, which assesses whether a new store would affect trade in the town centre. The White Paper insists that the Government is “fully committed to promoting the vitality and viability of town centres,” and that a replacement test would be introduced to protect high streets.
Independent retailers expressed concern that the new rules could lead to shops going out of business. James Lowman, chief executive of the Association of Convenience Stores, said: “There is a lot of fear of the unknown.”
He said that in Scotland, where planning rules did not require a needs test, there was a higher proportion of new development out of town than there was in England and Wales. “The needs test, although imperfect, has overwhelmingly been a brake on out-of-town development and we are concerned that they are bringing in something which is not defined, with only promises that it will be better,” Mr Lowman said.
The Government will begin consultation on the new planning test this summer and will finalise changes by spring next year. The new rules will take into account the finding of the Competition Commission inquiry into the grocery market, which is expected to report in November.
The White Paper suggests that the Government will introduce a test that “promotes competition and improves consumer choice, avoiding the unintended effects of the current need test”.
Stuart Robinson, head of planning at CB Richard Ellis, the property company, said the indications were that the Government had taken into consideration concerns that removal of the needs test would limit the powers of local authorities to control new retail developments. “Planning has always been against dealing with competitive issues, but that may now change,” he said.
Sainsbury’s, the supermarket chain, has been lobbying for a “fascia test” that took into account the number of stores that a particular retailer has in an area.
The plan
— Independent commission to decide on major infrastructure projects
— A simplified local planning system to speed up home improvements such as lofts, extensions, conservatories
— Homeowners will no longer need planning permission for green improvements such as solar panels and wind turbines
— Legal requirement for developers to consult public
— New test to boost out-of-town shopping where it will not damage town centre business
— Local councils will have the power to rule whether out-of-town shops should go ahead
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I estimate 85% of Cornish consumers retail spending is with corporate retailers, mostly out-of -town; so 85% of the potential retail profit leaves Cornwall. You can probably reckon this equates to £100 million per year or £1000 million over the last 10 years in which time we have been given £3-400 million Objective One funding leaving us £600 million short with little chance of more funding. Much of local manufacturing and agriculture has been replaced by low-cost imports, pushing more and more towards tax-credits. Young energetic workers are leaving to look for work and properties to rent, seperating them from the parents and communities they want to be with.
Everyone knows whats going on, so why all the deception and lies? For a government big on health and safey / proper risk assessment , why do they are they allowing so much demolition consent on town-centre economies, with all the late-night pollution that follows Balance of payments?.
Bye,
Wesley Bowden, Helston, Cornwall- pathetically sad
Now that the government is planning to charge us to drive our cars and yet is helping supermarkets move shops to locations you can only drive too, is this not going to act as yet another crippling tax on the population??
sally, bristol,
The warnings in these readers' comments are entirely valid and should be heeded. Unfortunately I suspect they won't be. There is a certain pig-headedness about the english-speaking countries that makes them refuse to learn from the successes or mistakes of others. They seem to have to repeat the mistakes themselves before they learn.
David Bond, Wellinton, New Zealand
Thie shows the government's lack of "joined up" thinking. It wants us to cut down on car use, and today you also report that cities are to be encouraged to improve public transport with the proceeds of road pricing. It tries to reassure us it's not in favour of concreting over green spaces, and that it's trying to improve the lot of the elderly.
Encouraging out-of-town shopping centres flies in the face of all of this. These centres are invariably hard to reach without a car so many older people without cars are excluded from them, while reducing demand for public transport (because cars have to be used) tends to worsen the standard of service. And of course the centres use up a lot of land in our small island.
Barry, Wallington,
Not a good idea, at least it's not been, on my side of the Great Pond. Oh sure, development has happened--continues to happen--in my part of NY state, at an alarming rate. The result? Community after community, bemoaning the loss of its "green space," and, serious traffic and pollution problems--also, small businesses do indeed suffer, especially when a huge chain store comes in, that can undercut prices.
In 13 years, during the early to late 80's, I watched the entire character of one town change--from charming and rural, to a seriously unattractive urban-style surburb, where one could not go out in the morning, without the smell of exhaust fumes filling one's lungs.
If that's what the towns of England want, well, who's to stop them? Town planning has it's ridiculous sides, certainly, but it also can have many benefits, that in the long run, can prove to be a town's greatest asset.
Nancy, Glens Falls, USA NY
Retail sites with associated parking create thousands of car journeys. Worse still, they create car ownership, as every housewife needs a car to do the shopping.
For the sake of the environment we must clamp down on this totally unnecessary waste of oil.
Malcolm McLean, Bradford, UK