Richard Ford, Home Correspondent
Win luxury hampers plus Waitrose vouchers & guidebooks
The flow of migrants from Eastern Europe seeking work in Britain rose last year, with more than 20,000 a month registering for the first time with the Government.
Figures published yesterday show huge numbers of young migrants are continuing to head for Britain, more than two years after eight former Soviet bloc states joined the EU. A total of 232,000 initial applications for work were made last year — more than 20,000 up on 2005.
The continuing surge in the number of jobseekers is also highlighted by initial applications in October and November last year being 3,000 higher than in June and July. Yet in previous years the numbers fluctuated, with more applicants in summer than winter.
Overall, more than 579,000 people have registered with the Government since May 2004, when Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Slovakia, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland joined the EU.
Almost two thirds of the total — 360,000 — were Poles, followed by Lithuanians and Slovaks, who made up 11 per cent and 10 per cent of applicants respectively. The figures do not include the self-employed, estimated at 200,000.
Although Liam Byrne, the Immigration Minister, insists that the large migrant work-force is benefiting Britain, the continuing increase will cause disquiet among Labour back-bench MPs who are concerned at the scale of migration. Local councils have also expressed concern about the impact of such large-scale migration on public services.
John Reid, the Home Secretary, has reacted to their alarm by imposing strict curbs on Bulgarians and Romanians, the latest new EU entrants who can come to work in Britain.
Mr Byrne said the latest figures showed that migrant workers were filling skill and labour gaps that could not be met by the native population. He added: “We need to maintain progress on our immigration reforms and understand the transitional impacts from the accession in 2004 before we take the next step.”
Initially, research for the Home Office estimated that up to 13,000 migrants would seek work in the first year after accession.
David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, said: “These figures completely blow that estimate out of the water. Immigration can be of real benefit to the country but only if it is properly controlled, taking into account its impact on the economy, public services and social cohesion. This is demonstrably not the case.”
The figures show that although the number of Poles heading for Britain continues to increase, amounting to almost three quarters of all initial applications in the final three months of 2006, the number of migrants from the Czech Republikc, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia fell by more than 25 per cent last year.
In another set of figures released yesterday asylum applications fell to their lowest level since 1993 last year as part of a general decline in numbers seeking refuge in the EU. Despite the fall, Britain remains the second-favourite EU destination after France.
A total of 23,710 applicants, rising to 27,800 including dependants, sought asylum last year, compared with the record of 103,000 five years ago after the Home Office lost control of the immigration system.
The Home Office missed its target for deporting failed asylum-seekers in the last three months of the year but for 2006 as a whole hit the target set by the Prime Minister. Overall, 18,235 failed asylum-seekers and dependants were removed.
Role call
100,000
East Europeans registered for work in administration and business (approx)
38,000
in hospitality and catering
19,700
in agriculture
2,500
bus, lorry and coach drivers
1,000
as doctors, nurses and paramedical specialists 700 as teachers, researchers and classroom assistants
Source: Home Office
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Overseas contacts and local business information
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Homes Available on a shared Ownership Basis
Great Investment, River Views
Visit the ‘entertainment capital of the world’
at great sale prices!
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Dont blame the immigrants, blame the successive UK Governments. If the reports of millions of skilled ex-Soviet Union immigrants are taking jobs from British citizens are correct then one thing is clear. While the Eastern communists were busy training their nationals to be able to feed themselves for life, the UK communists were busy establishing a monolith of a Welfare System to ensure that the State would be able to feed their nationals for life. Is it any wonder? What you sow so shall you reap.
Ken Morrison, Ken Morison, Switzerland
We are only a small country or doesn't the Immigration Service realise this fact!! Our entry points need to be closed for a length of time to determine who is here and who needs to leave. No wonder the NHS is bankrupt with all the extra bodies coming in from Europe seeking free medical treatment and the assylum seekers whom the Government know nothing about. We are fit to burst and all our hard fought perks and rights are being given freely to foreigners who basically couldn't care less about us or how we feel.
Mike, Ilkley, England
Immigration is part of natural human behaviour but the level at which it takes place needs to be controlled. For those who have the skills to be mobile, all well and good (I live in Germany) but all this talk about immigration being of a total benefit for the population revolves purely around economic factors which themselves are spurious. If the government cannot say how many immigrants there are, how can they calculate the benefit of people they can't count (half of which don't appear on the official statistics) ?
John Brown, Muenchen, Germany
When will people wake up to the fact that we can have ALL the benefits of EU membership and retain parliamentary sovereignty, others do. EU has nothing to do with immigration, we can always allow who we like into the country, the trouble now is we have no control over it. The figures in article are official registrations and all these people are paying tax, eligible for benefits etc. If you look at the breakdown it is skewed towards Admin & Business, because the companies they work for have abide by the rules. I have not heard anyone complaining about this type of worker,why? because they are economically viable and welcome to come. The problem is with those who are not registered, its safe to say that if 19,000 are in hospitality that 2 or 3 times that number, the fact is nobody knows how many, certainly not the govt. That will be untaxed, cheap labour, competeing with the low paid, those on income support and 1m unemployed. Add in a minimum wage and you have another subsidy to teh EU
Tony MvNumpty, London, UK
These migrants seem to think they are doing us a favour.
MARIE LAMB, stockport, England
Well I've got 4 relatives who live (have bought houses) and work abroad (in other EU states), 1 friend currently works in a non-EU European state, another has lived in another EU country for 2 years; several old school friends live in New Zealand and Australia. One friend has bought a retirement house in Spain, another a house in France. Oh, and my wifes friends are moving to Canada, and another friend of hers to Chicago. US migration is 6 times higher than in the EU - get with the program!! Stop being a Cinderella Continent!!
Jon Kingsbury, Southampton, UK
These statistics need to be balanced by how many nationals are leaving the UK to work overseas or retire.
As an island nation we should have exact figures on who is coming in & going out - estimates are not acceptable. We need a proper Coast Guard Service and a department of Home Land Security - the Home Office has failed the nation. The figures published or given to Parliment are white washed and unreliable having been dressed up by civil servants to meet the needs of their political task masters.
Derek Boulter, Sugar Land, Texas, USA
They may be bringing benefits, but whole communities are breaking up with the influx of such numbers of non english speaking people. I'm the outsider in my own town!
James, Reading,
We are constantly being told that immigrant labour benefits this country's economy (maybe, if the employers pay them slave wages and even then the only ones who really gain are their employers because with such low wages the migrant workers cannot be paying much tax in this country or spending much here as they send most of what they earn to their families back home.
As for the immigrants doing the jobs the native population do not want to do I ask: How did Britain manage before? Who did those jobs before mass immigration arrived?
Meanwhile, the native unskilled workers, and many others, are losing their jobs or facing the threat of long term unemployment as they compete for work with migrant workers who are willing (or forced) to accept much lower wages than those who were born here, who always paid their taxes and NI, have a mortgage and a family / children to feed, clothe and educate.
No wonder the English who can are leaving this country and it is not because of the weather.
Madeleine, London,
But why do they get jobs! Because employers know that they will work for their money. Few come here for national health benifits, and a high proportion intend to return home after a few years.
Frances, Shepton Mallet,
Britain should value its highly skilled migrants from outside the EU. As a work permit holder working for a respectable business, I feel deeply frustrated about the change of immigration rules in April 2005. When I first started working here, I was told that I will be able to get my permanent residency in four years. The sudden change of rules means that I have to wait for another year. I can only work for one employer. I pay the same amount of tax as a British citizen but I am not entitled for any benefits. Some highly skilled migrants have to go home after investing their skills here for four years because they only have a four year contract with their employers and their visa can't be renewed. New immigrations rules should not apply to people who are already here. If Britain wants to retain its highly skilled workforce, it should be consistent with its policies on immigration.
Julia Chan, London, UK
When is it going to end.? Britain is only a small country. What have we got to offer them that no other country has - apart from free housing, free benefits, free NHS system? I am desperate to get out of this country now but cannot go because other countries have strict regulations about people entering their country. Why are we letting every Tom, Dick and Harry into this country? Somebody somewhere must be getting a very large back hander!! Politicians do not see the problem as they don't have to live next door to it. We have certain parts of where I live that are out of bounds to anybody remotely white or english because the area has been taken over by rival gangs - how can this be allowed to happen?
Carol, Chatham, Kent
David Davis is correct immigration is benificial for a country as long as it is controlled and that the immigrant has the skills the country needs. Pouring people in at 20,000 a month is plain stupid but what can you expect with a socialist goverment, they just seem to lack any ability to control anything , that is other than taxes.
Barry Holmes, Christchurch, NZ