Last week’s letters column contained an inquiry from a chap called Gordy Lincoln, accusing me of “consistently failing to order pudding”. He made it sound pretty serious. “Consistently failing” has the chilling ring of the magistrate’s court about it. Or, worse, the school report. Should I persist in this attitude, he seemed to be saying, I would find myself having to repeat the year, and go right back to doing pointless little 100-word Time Out reviews (in pencil) of “cheap eatz”, before I was let loose on a national newspaper colour supplement again.

He went on to ask: “Just what is it you have against this course? Or, perish the thought, does Esther have you on some sort of diet?”

And the thing is that he was not far wide of the mark. I have never been a supporter of the pudding as a course in its own right. It is rationalised by mere convention and is a relic of 18th-century vanities, Antonin Carême and the heyday of service à la russe.

Nutritionally, it contains nothing of value at all. It’s just sugar and starch or, at a push, a bit of fruit poached, roasted or baked to well past the point where anything useful in it is left intact. Pudding is nothing but wasted calories, meaningless sugar spike, tragic glycaemic overload.

Expert View

It’s a truly staggering place to sit and eat, however you look at it

Giles Coren

• More

• Post a comment

More reviews

• Giles Coren reviews HIX

• The Greenhouse

• Giles Coren reviews Whitechapel Gallery Dining Room, London

More reviews

• Giles Coren reviews Chez Marcelle

• Giles Coren reviews the Criterion, London

• Giles Coren reviews Sojo, Oxford

• Giles Coren reviews Caleya Ibérica

• Giles Coren reviews The Drapers Arms

Related Links

• The Greenhouse

I eat 4,000-5,000 calories a day as it is, which is twice the recommended daily intake. As a consequence, I try to exercise properly about four times a week, which is just enough to stay the right side of critically obese. If I ate pudding as well I would either have to live on a treadmill, taking my meals liquidised through a tube as I ran, or I’d have to accept swelling to the size of a Texan.

But then my fingers would be too fat to type. Each flabby-digited punch at a key would depress seven or eight letters at a time and this review would have begun: “op.lrxfcdarxfcdajbi bvfcwraewrEWIJK.” And then you’d really have had something to write letters about.

Also, I don’t have a sweet tooth. The taste for sweet things does not normally last much past puberty in men, except in those pudgy-faced, childlike fellows in Guardian mail-order shoes you see sitting alone by the aisle in cinemas, buried in a king-size carton of pick’n’mix, like pigs rootling in a bin.

I just can’t imagine who would go to a restaurant for the puddings. Pudding is just a sugar hit for diners who have drunk too much and need a lift to get them out of the restaurant and into the car. And besides, who on earth has room for pudding after two courses of the kind of monstrous portions restaurants now provide, in response to years of heckling by their increasingly lard-arsed clientele?

I usually order three or four starters between two, for the sake of an overview, then three mains to share, and a couple of sides. My eyes, at the start of any meal (reviewing or otherwise), are bigger than my belly. But by the time I am done with my mains, my belly has caught up and is once again bigger than my eyes (which is an aesthetic blessing, if nothing else). So then, when I am sitting there stuffed as hell, they bring me another menu. And my newly small eyes just want them to go away.

But they insist, prodding it towards me. I roll my eyes and heave and fart and wave them away. But still they grovel and fawn. Sometimes I get the whine about how distraught the new pastry chef will be if I don’t try her tortured sugar weasel in its raspberry cage, and I have to pull the man down to my slumping eye level and give him the full Mr Creosote.

Even then they’ll bring petits fours with the coffee, which I am compelled to load on to the handle end of a spoon and then, banging the scoop end with my fat fist, launch into the chandeliers.

So perhaps you will give me a break for not having had pudding at Mark Hix’s intriguingly named new Soho restaurant, HIX (is it an acronym for something? A Latin pun?), although there were eight available, including an “Amedei chocolate mousse” – presumably some variation on the less popular Opus Dei chocolate mousse, which contains no chocolate and is delivered straight to the naked back of the diner by means of a cat-o’-nine-tails.

Times Recommends

• Top Ten most searched for recipes
• Chalet Chef 2010: the winning menus
• Gin and pomegranate jellies