<!-- Feed -->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/tol/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:thespringbox="http://www.thespringbox.com/dtds/thespringbox-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Times Online | Peter Riddell</title>
<description>Peter Riddell is a leading political commentator. He writes mainly about British politics and has published several books on the subject</description>
<language>en-uk</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2007 Times Newspapers Ltd.</copyright>
<webMaster>custserv@timesonline.co.uk</webMaster>
<link>http://www.timesonline.co.uk </link>
<lastBuildDate>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:16:42 GMT
</lastBuildDate>
<category>Newspapers</category>

<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>TV debates are often the most talked about events of the campaign</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-02-07T08:55:17Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7018389.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7018389.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
Britain is catching up with most other Western democracies in having televised leaders&#8217; debates during the general election. Overseas evidence suggests that such debates are more often talking points than turning points, attracting a lot of media interest but seldom changing the outcome, except when the election is already very close.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>The final verdict on MPs' claims will come on election day</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell: Political Briefing</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-02-05T11:37:41Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7015812.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7015812.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
Every MP reading yesterday&#8217;s Legg report knows that it is not the final verdict. That will come on election day. MPs&#8217; main thought throughout has been what their constituents and, in particular, potential electoral rivals will make of it.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>Gordon Brown&#8217;s attempt at constitutional reform is gesture politics</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-02-02T10:20:56Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7012865.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7012865.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
Gordon Brown has always been better at talking about constitutional reform than achieving it. It was typical that he announced a referendum on the alternative vote (AV) only three months before the likely election date, when the proposals have no chance of becoming law.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>It's the timing, not necessarity the size, that matters</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:01:32 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-02-01T08:52:33Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7011627.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7011627.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
No incoming government can make &#8220;swingeing&#8221; or &#8220;particularly extensive&#8221; cuts 
in public spending during its first year. On that David Cameron is correct, 
however much he has muddled the presentation by appearing to tone down his 
party&#8217;s earlier tough rhetoric in response to a sluggish economy.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>Three attacks on how Britain is governed</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell: Political Briefing</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-01-28T09:01:03Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7007128.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article7007128.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
Weaknesses in the way government works are the common thread of the Chilcot inquiry and three heavyweight reports in the past ten days:	
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
