<!-- Feed -->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/tol/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:thespringbox="http://www.thespringbox.com/dtds/thespringbox-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Times Online | Peter Riddell</title>
<description>Peter Riddell is a leading political commentator. He writes mainly about British politics and has published several books on the subject</description>
<language>en-uk</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2007 Times Newspapers Ltd.</copyright>
<webMaster>custserv@timesonline.co.uk</webMaster>
<link>http://www.timesonline.co.uk </link>
<lastBuildDate>
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:33:41 GMT
</lastBuildDate>
<category>Newspapers</category>

<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>Queen&#8217;s Speech neglects the problems: the deficit and MPs' expenses</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell: Commentary</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2009-11-19T12:59:22Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6922474.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6922474.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
The Queen&#8217;s Speech was both ephemeral and a missed opportunity, as well as being, paradoxically, very revealing about the Brown Government&#8217;s thinking. Most of the measures will deservedly soon be forgotten and will have little influence on the election compared with what was not mentioned: specific measures to reduce the budget deficit and sorting out the parliamentary expenses row.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>Wright Committee is a first step towards reforming Parliament</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell, Political Briefing</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2009-11-12T10:27:05Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6915012.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6915012.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
Reforming Parliament involves a lot more than just cleaning up politics &#8212; it also means showing that our MPs are effective. That is why Tony Wright&#8217;s committee on Commons matters is a first, important step towards adjusting the balance of power between the legislature, the executive and the voters.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>It&#8217;s wrong to see a hung Parliament as dangerous</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell: Commentary</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2009-11-10T10:14:15Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6911777.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6911777.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
A hung Parliament is a rarity at Westminster but the norm in many other 
democracies. Our first&#45;past&#45;the&#45;post electoral system tends to produce 
outright victors and that fosters a winner&#45;takes&#45;all political culture.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>A big step, but only a step, towards an acceptable system</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell: Political Briefing</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2009-11-04T11:13:58Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6903776.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6903776.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
The main party leaders are too eager to close down the MPs&#8217; expenses row. Their unanimity yesterday that the Kelly report should be accepted &#8220;in full&#8221; is misleading. Their motive, to show that the political class recognises the urgency of putting its house in order, is correct. And so is the implicit warning that MPs should not seek to unravel Kelly.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>Cameron&#8217;s Europe policy must reconcile incompatible objectives</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Peter Riddell: Political Briefing</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2009-11-04T01:14:08Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6901922.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882493]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/peter_riddell/article6901922.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
David Cameron has always presented himself as a &#8220;pretty straightforward sort of person&#8221; in the Tony Blair mould of the mid&#45;1990s. Now, he needs to deploy the more devious political skills of the two Harolds of the 1960s &#8212; Macmillan and Wilson &#8212; in trying to reconcile incompatible objectives.	
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
