<!-- Feed -->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/tol/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:thespringbox="http://www.thespringbox.com/dtds/thespringbox-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Comment - Columnists - Minette Marin</title>
<description/>
<language>en-uk</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2007 Times Newspapers Ltd.</copyright>
<webMaster>custserv@timesonline.co.uk</webMaster>
<link>http://www.timesonline.co.uk </link>
<lastBuildDate>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:16:42 GMT
</lastBuildDate>
<category>Newspapers</category>

<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>Facebook, a competition for the most imaginary friends</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Minette Marrin</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-02-06T11:08:02Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article7017824.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882813]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article7017824.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
How many friends does a person need? That was the question that startled me out of my February gloom last Thursday when listening to the BBC&#8217;s Today programme. The answer was startling. Apparently the outer limit for friends is about 150, according to Robin Dunbar, Oxford professor of evolutionary anthropology and author of a book on the subject. To lay down an outer limit is not really to answer the question; it is to suggest how many friends one doesn&#8217;t need or cannot handle. But either way it is all odd, as if there were some kind of felicific calculus for friendship and one that applies to us all equally, however different our natures.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>The insidious triumph of the facelifting classes</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Minette Marrin</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-01-31T05:18:09Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article7009663.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882813]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article7009663.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
It is bad enough getting old. What makes it worse is the constant pressure, 
these days, to deny it or disguise it. There is endless media wittering 
about 40 being the new 30 and 70 being the new 60, with the implication that 
we all should look and feel at least 10 years younger than we are. Now Emma 
Soames, Saga magazine&#8217;s editor&#45;at&#45;large, has come up with an irritating new 
celebration of being 50: women in their fifties are, supposedly, newly 
fantastic and having a new, fantastically improved youthful time of 
late&#45;onset confidence and vigour. She calls them &#8212; in one of those 
neologisms that make one&#8217;s granny glasses fug up with annoyance &#8212; the 
Quintastics.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>We must target radicals &#8211; before they target us</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Minette Marrin</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-01-09T10:38:38Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6982312.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882813]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6982312.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
If the price of freedom is eternal vigilance, the same is true of public 
safety. The failed airline bomber at Christmas has reminded everyone of 
that. But vigilance is not the same as constant state surveillance: that 
would make freedom itself the price of public safety. It is surely obvious 
that vigilance must be carefully directed and focused &#8212; in other words, 
targeted. Only by careful targeting of the few can we avoid indiscriminate, 
mass intrusion into the freedom and the privacy of the many.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>It&#8217;s a no&#45;brainer &#8211; bring on the pills that will make us smarter</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Minette Marrin</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2010-01-02T10:35:19Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6973986.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882813]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6973986.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
In among all the gloomy predictions for the next decade is one that is astonishingly cheering. In the near future neurologists will be able to halt the process of Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. At present they can treat only the symptoms but soon, having detected the disease in its early stages with biomarkers, they will be able to stop it getting any worse with drugs that are neuro&#45;protector agents.	
</description>
</item>
<!--START: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<!--END: Fix for Artifact 715508: Archive RSS Feed-->
<item>
<title>This is what public servants must do to fix Britain &#8212; nothing</title>
<atom:author>
<atom:name>Minette Marrin</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:02:47 GMT</pubDate>
<atom:updated>2009-12-26T09:10:22Z</atom:updated>
<link>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6968582.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=1882813]]>
</link>
<guid>
<![CDATA[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/minette_marrin/article6968582.ece]]>
</guid>
<description>	
&#34;Don&#8217;t just do something&#33; Stand there&#33;&#8221; That was one of Ronald Reagan&#8217;s 
favourite instructions, supposedly, although it has been attributed to other 
people too. Whoever said it, to me it makes excellent good sense. How I wish 
this sage commandment could be writ large in every government office in the 
land.	
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
