Gerard Baker
The man, the films, those blondes. Free DVD collection starting this Sunday
Just 622 days to go and the US presidential election campaign is entering its final frenzy of activity. With the race entering the home stretch, the field has narrowed to the last 117 candidates and they are desperately striving, as the clock ticks down the last 21 months, to convince the dwindling number of undecided voters that they should be the next President.
The big story this week was on the Democratic side where Hillary Clinton, whose political skin is about as sensitive these days as Britney Spears’s cranium, got into an ugly fight with Barack Obama, the saintly new man of American politics.
It all involved, as it nearly always does in Democratic politics, hurt feelings over the shifting affections of Hollywood moguls. David Geffen, of Spielberg-Katzenberg-Geffen Dreamworks fame, held a $1.3 million fundraiser in Los Angeles for Mr Obama this week, and while he was at it said some unpalatable (read: true) things about the Clintons.
“Everybody in politics lies,” he told Maureen Dowd, the New York Times columnist, “but they [the Clintons] do it with such ease it’s troubling.”
This constitutes a high tackle in anyone’s game book but what made it much worse is that Mr Geffen used to be a Clinton man. He forked out millions of dollars for the First Family during the Bill Clinton presidency when that was the going rate for a night of fun in the Lincoln bedroom at the White House (of course, if you were female, 22 years old and in the habit of displaying a thong above your outer garments, deep discounts were available).
Mrs Clinton said Mr Geffen’s remarks were outrageous and called on Mr Obama to return Mr Geffen’s tainted 1.3 million pieces of silver.
Shan’t, said Mr Obama, and anyway you’ve consorted with some people who’ve said nasty things about me. And on it goes.
On the Republican side, things were simmering nicely as Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts Governor, also got into a bit of trouble. He attacked other candidates for their not very conservative views on social issues such as abortion but then had to own up to some extraordinary gyrations of his own on the subject. By his admission, it now looks as though he was against abortion, then he was for it, then he was against it again and now he’s for it (I do not exaggerate).
And Dick Cheney, the Vice-President, ever eager to reinforce his reputation as the final repository of lost causes, clashed with Senator John McCain, another leading Republican candidate, over the latter’s observation this week that Donald Rumsfeld was “one of the worst secretaries of defence in history”.
“I think Don’s a great secretary,” Mr Cheney told ABC News, in a curious use of the present tense that only augmented the sense that he lives in his own slightly delusional universe, and went on to suggest that Mr McCain ought to apologise to Mr Rumsfeld.
They’re not going to be able to keep this up. If it goes on like this for another 20 months American presidential politics is going to resemble one of those barroom scenes in a Western where no one is left standing except for the little old dipso in the corner blissfully unaware of the carnage going on around him.
The ridiculously early start to the 2008 presidential election could create an entirely new dynamic all of its own. It is quite possible that by the autumn, when the campaign would normally be starting, and when there will still be four months to go before the first votes are cast in the two parties’ primary elections, that voters will be thoroughly turned off. Even if they haven’t succeeded in making each other look like the devil, the candidates run the risk of simply boring everybody senseless.
As Newt Gingrich, the former Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, who has perhaps shrewdly opted to sit this out until the autumn, said this week, it will be like one of those television reality shows where the viewers will want to vote everybody off.
This could just be the germ of an idea. Since American Idol, the musical talent show, is the most successful programme in television history, watched by tens of millions of people every night, perhaps a more useful way of winnowing the presidential field would be to have them stand up and perform in front of Simon Cowell, who could offer withering assessments of their efforts: “Did you say you were the grandson of a Kenyan goat herder, Mr Obama? I think you might want to get back into the family business.”
Furthermore, since the primary elections, in which the two main parties select their presidential candidates, are now to be bunched into a short period early next year, it means that by early February 2008, we will know who those candidates will be and will face — at nine months — the longest general election campaign in history.
All this raises two intriguing possibilities. First, one of the handful of American-born citizens over the age of 35 who is not a candidate for President at the moment could emerge from nowhere as a contender in the late stages of the blood-spattered primaries.
Who could this be? On the Republican side, clearly Mr Gingrich himself is a potential contender, though, even on the sidelines he remains a divisive figure in American politics, after a bruising decade with the Clintons.
On the Democratic side, much attention will focus on Al Gore, the former Vice-President. But I doubt that he will want to risk his Oscar and Nobel-prize-winning purity by diving once again into the mucky pool of presidential politics.
More likely is that one of the current second-tier candidates in the Democratic race — Bill Richardson, the former Governor of New Mexico, pictured, for example, or even Tom Vilsack, the former Governor of Iowa, will get catapaulted into the front ranks.
The second possibility is that, as the long general election next year bores and alienates more voters there must be a similar chance of a third-party candidate emerging to take on the designated Democrat and Republican — as Ross Perot did in 1992, and again, less successfully in 1996.
Step forward, President Donald Trump?

Gerard Baker is United States Editor and an Assistant Editor of The Times. He joined in 2004 from the Financial Times, where he had spent over ten years as Tokyo correspondent and Washington Bureau Chief. His weekly oped column appears on Fridays
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
In your feature 'coping with back pain' Sunday Times 25 feb 07 Daniel Elkan Health Feature, In Gear. You featured a Posture Curve Lumbar Support Cushion £35 from www.postureproducts.co.uk However, I cannot locate this website and cannot find any similar product on any other sites I have tried. Please could you forward me any details you have of how I might obtain one of these cushions. Thank you.
Mrs. Jane Egan, Wirral, Merseyside, England
I would like to ask your writer Chris Woodhouse about GSCE options if possible. My question may have some general relevence to many parents in my position.
My son is in year 9 and choosing his GCSE options. He is in a small group of bright children who have been offered the opportunity to take AS level Critical Thinking along with their GCSEs. The school feels this new course will be beneficial to many areas of the curriculum. However, taking Critical Thinking will mean dropping one of his other choices, currently History, Geography and French. He unsure what to do at A level but seems likely to pursue English or Humanities
I would be grateful for your thoughts as to whether Critical Thinking AS is a worthwhile course and whether it really does enrich the curriculum. How favourably university admissions departments look on it ?
Nick Jones, Brentwood, Essex, England
I think the donald and many others see a real need for new blood to run this country.bush has proved one fact of those,IQ does matter.But their must be less painful ways to discover such simple concepts.If i was the bush,Iwould hang my head in shame for being so dump,but the is the nice thing about being dump.you are to dump to know it!!!!
dan brown, lakeland, fl
So far I would vote for Obama in the Primaries but if Clinton won the primary I would vote for Tommy Thomson a republican in the finals
trouble, Wales, usa
Inheritance Tax is overwhelmingly the most unfair tax. My wife and I have one house, one car and make do with one overseas trip a year and all our life we have been frugal and careful with our money. But we have four married 'children' and ten grandchildren and would LOVE to be able to help all ten on to the housing ladder. Left to ourselves we could do this, with what we have saved, but with Inheritance Tax, the Chancellor will gleefully make sure we can't; he wants a big whack of this money. I would vote for any Party which would exclude one's main residence from this ghastly tax.
D C Jenkin, Petersfield, UK
What hurt the democrats most in the last election was nobody knew who John Kerry was before the primarys. By throwing their hat in the ring early, it gives them a chance to be in the public eye longer, so when/if they do get the nomination, people won't say "this guy is rich because of ketchup? wtf." Also, with regards to Clinton and Obama, it lets the thought of having a woman/black president sink in for a while, and maybe earn some acceptance in the fragile minds of the bewildered herd. I think it's a good approach, but it just gets us excited to have a new face in the whitehouse, only to realize that we still have to wait another year and a half. Like going through a christmas catalog in June.
Jeffery, Billings, Montana
Well, Vilsack is already out of it. I thought he would be one of the dark horses who emerged later in the year. Although I am uncommitted at this early stage, I say keep an eye on John Edwards and Sam Brownback. They could easily take the lead of their respective parties if the front runners stumble. And don't leave out Wisconsin Governor Tommy Thompson or Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel.
David Shipp, Nevada, MO
This is the earliest we ever had a run for president, and they are so many to choose from. This is the biggest example of such bad job been done in the Bush administration. sen.McClain does not seem to be able to realize the people is fed up with the Bush administration.
Never before have we had such a high profile of a vice president, and they not a single soul out there willing to come up with a draft Cheney for president that in it self tell what kind administration this has been.
What ever the future turns out to be will be a major improvement
shenanigan, mcminnville, usa/tn
Great piece! - as a Brit living in Florida (in fact Palm Beach county - where the fiasco over butterfly ballots and 'hanging chads' took place) - I needed a reality check to remind me how ridiculous US politics appear to the rest of the world. As if the USA has not already damaged itself enough with the Iraq war - the very people who feel they have 'The Answer' to solve the Iraq issue, are showing how petty, and probably unqualified they are to run for President of the United States. If they are so focused on pettyness - they don't have a hope in hell of applying some common sense to the important issues such as healthcare, global warming and the war.
I think Mr Baker IS exaggerating - Mitt Romney is firmly against abortion!
Jane, Boca Raton, Florida
Bill Richardson is currently a governor of New Mexico - NOT a former governor. Please correct it.
Zak Farah, San Jose, California
US Presidential elections are nothing short of any Reality show, with"Big Brother" watching the contenders , drooling,showing fisticuffs and groveling in this muck race for their final destination to the "White House". More than 600 odd days left, (which is more than a year long time), yet the count down has started and the things are getting hot and stuffy. That's the game of American Politics, as good as it be , like a full flush round of Backgammon , very dicey and dodgy like touch-and-go !! The campaign for Prez. elections is likely to commence from Fall/Autumn, and all those contenders who are dicky and frail(sic) shall give a walk-over to their robust rivals. May not be all a Gentlemen's game, where lot of gerrymandering , arm-twisting and tongue-wagging will be witnessed . And a feast of time for ghost-writers and fund-raisers to spin their verbal yarns and virtuosity in writing long-winded,rabble-rousing election speeches . Just keep awake, watch Clinton's and Obama's spat !!
Sandy, New Delhi, India
You're right. Early leaders crater more often than not and from where I sit now, that's a good thing. It's time for some real grown-ups to get a chance at being President. After two petulant adolecents, a cypher, an ideolog, (though Reagan did have his uses) and a well meaning bumbler, we may be ready for (and God knows we need) someone who is qualified.
Hmmm. Could we reincarnate Ike?
Jim Walton, Washington, DC
I'm sad to say that I don't think we will ever break free of the two headed one dragon election system here in the U.S.A.
Michael Dooley, Lakewood, Ohio, U.S.A.
Mr. Baker has concisely made an unsaid point here. All this wondering who will be the Democratic nominee is very right. Yet, what is telling is that no one much cares who the Republican nominee will be. With the incredibly incompetent people currently in power, only a totally unelectable Democratic candidate would foil the Democratic bid for the Presidency. Still, knowing their tendancy to do just that, it sure makes for a lot of tension and uncertainity if you live here in the U.S. Of course the Rebublicans could always just steal the election. That seemed to work pretty well for them once before.
Steve Mareno, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.
Step forward, President Michael Bloomberg, not Donald Trump!!! Great article except for that.
Mike, Ausitn,
Mr. Baker is almost 100% correct, save his ending. The third party fellow won't be The Donald, but rather New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg. God help us all.
Jeff Myhre, New York City, USA
The article, as I read it, says Vilsack was the governor of Iowa.
Is Ralph in need of glasses, or was the article surreptitiously changed following his comment, but without acknowledgment?
It would be a bit naughty, that.
JR, London,
I think I am right in saying that the next President of the United States is the 44th. I donât know whether this number has any resonance in the game of Bingo but I believe it does in the game of politics. We should therefore be especially wide-awake to enjoy the show, as it wont come around for another 176 years and then as a factor of 2 - assuming that anyone has managed to survive climate change, Al Quaeda, Tsunamis, and so forth. I hope the timesonline will provide comprehensive, instructive, and, perhaps, entertaining coverage.
Henry Percy, London, UK
A beautifully bitchy critique. Small point, though: Vilsack was governor of Iowa, not Idaho. Think corn (oops, maize across the pond), not potatoes.
Ralph, Somers, Connecticut
looks like it's time for Howard Dean, et al, to hold a serious come-to-Jesus meeting in a smoke-filled back room.
Rick, Salt Lake City, USA
It worries me how often you make little slip ups. Can it please be noted that Bill Richardson is the CURRENT Governor of New Mexico, while Tom Vilsack is actually the former Governor of IOWA.
The rest appears to be ok ;)
Actually, I wonder if the 3rd party could start to be influential, or whether the 2 parties will prevent it by simply point out the effect they have (Perot handed Clinton the Presidency, while Nader certainly cost Gore - and the rest of the world as a result). There was a campaign being launched a year ago called Unity '08, which would "overcome partisan divisions". We'll see...
Jonathan, Sydney, Australia
Mrs. Clinton will be the Democratic Party presidential candidate and Rudy Giuliani will be the Republican Party candidate.
Don't permit Mr. Baker to fool you.
Robert Dare, Clinton, Missoui, USA
Nice commentary, but Vilsack is the former governor of Iowa, not Idaho... anyway, not too bad, considering you are from the other side of the pond! You are correct, governors like Richardson and Vilsack always have an easier time getting elected president. The Senate is a death trap, although they keep trying to be president. The last one elected from the Senate to the Presidency was JFK. Ex-governors: Carter (Georgia), Reagan, (California), Clinton (Arkansas) and Bush (Texas) . Right now, Guiliani the ex-mayor from New York City is leading the Republican pack. He was the can-do guy after 9/11. This too, may change.
Tony Francis, Wichita, KS/USA
I say, Gerald Baker -
Tom Vilsack was the Governor of Iowa, not Idaho. If you are going to write for the Manchester Times, ya gotta get your names & places straight.
Don Withers, Ames Iowa,